The foundation “both respectfully disagrees with and is disappointed by the court’s majority decision,” the group said.
![charles remington gun maker charles remington gun maker](https://revivaler.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Woodward-Best-Pre-War-Double-Rifle-2.jpg)
Remington has invoked the 2005 law in arguing that the case should be dismissed and has denied wrongdoing.Ī spokesman for the company told The Associated Press on Thursday that they have no timeline for commenting on the subject.īut the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the leading trade group for the firearms and ammunition industry, said the majority’s opinion was based on an “overly broad interpretation” of an exception to the law. Today’s decision is a critical step toward achieving that goal,” said Josh Koskoff, an attorney for the families. “The families’ goal has always been to shed light on Remington’s calculated and profit-driven strategy to expand the AR-15 market and court high-risk users, all at the expense of Americans’ safety. The families of nine victims and a survivor of the massacre had brought the lawsuit, arguing that Remington should be held accountable. “It falls to a jury to decide whether the promotional schemes alleged in the present case rise to the level of illegal trade practices and whether fault for the tragedy can be laid at their feet,” Justice Palmer wrote. On Thursday, the Connecticut justices ruled that, while the lower court was correct in dismissing many of the plaintiffs’ claims, they should be allowed to proceed with arguments on whether Remington’s marketing of the Bushmaster AR-15-style firearm violated state trade practices.